Search for content and authors |
A systematization of the structural stability in ANB8-N compounds based on the bond-order potential |
Tomonori Ito 1, Toru Akiyama , Kohji Nakamura |
1. Mie University, 1577 Kurima-Machiya, Tsu 5148507, Japan |
Abstract |
Wurtzite (WZ), zinc blende (ZB), and rocksalt (RS) structures are generally found in a number of binary octet A
N
B8-N compounds, such as GaN (WZ), GaAs (ZB), and ZnSe (ZB), MgS (RS). To clarify why a given compound is formed in a certain structure, there has been some qualitative systematization of structural trends that have been accomplished using the dielectric model, pseudopotential orbital radii, and electrostatic interactions. Although these systematizations give successful interpretation in some aspects such as the separation of fourfold and sixfold-coordinated structures of A
N
B8-N compounds, they cannot be applied to the structural stability for threefold-coordinated structure such as graphitic structure (G) crucial for nanotube and graphene. In this study, the bond-order potential (BOP) proposed by Abell [1] is employed to investigate the structural stability for A
N
B8-N compounds in terms of bond length re and cohesive energy De on the basis of the previously reported ab initio results for ZB and RS in 26 compounds. To extract the crucial factor for the systematization, bond order p as a function of coordination number Z is also estimated within the framework of BOP using our ab initio calculations for G, ZB, and RS of C, BN, BeO, and Si. Moreover, simple energy formula of electrostatic interactions [2] is applied to determine the separation of threefold and fourfold-coordinated structures of A
N
B8-Ncompounds.
Figure 1 shows the calculated Kz+Kd for 26 compounds on the basis of the relationship in BOP assuming p∝Z-c such as re=Kzln(Z)+Cz and re=Kdn(De/Z)+Cd where C, Cz, andCd are the constants. Despite the values of Kz+Kd derived from the results of ZB and RS without G, this figure definitely reveals that the larger the Kz+Kd, the more stable the low-coordinated structures. Since large Kz+Kd is directly related to small re, small bond length is crucial for stabilizing low-coordinated structure such as G. In the range of Z≤4, however, the relation p∝Z-c contradicts to ab initio results in Si obtained by Bazant and Kaxiras [3], who proposed p∝exp(-bZ2) instead of p∝Z-c. Thus we reasonably employ the formula of pZ≥4=(4/Z)c at Z≥4 and pZ≤4=aexp(-bZn) at Z≤4, where c, a, b, and n are the parameters adjusted to reproduce De for G, ZB, and RS with conditions of d(pZ≥4)/dZ=d(pZ≤4)/dZ and p=1 at Z=4. The calculated bond order p(3) for Si (p(3)=1.09) is favorably compared with the ab initio results (p(3)=1.05) [3]. It is found that the values of p(3) of C, BN, and BeO are larger than those of Si consistent with the empirical Pauling relation re∝-ln(p). Moreover, comparing the ionicity fi for each material with critical iconicity for the separation of threefold and fourfold-coordinated structures fic(3-4)=3p(3)2/(3p(3)2+2Zi2) estimated by electrostatic interactions between bond charges p and between ionic charges Zi, graphitic structure G is favored in C and BN because of their fi (0 for C and 0.143 for BN) smaller than fic(3-4) (0.107 for C and 0.174 for BN) whereas WZ appears in BeO with its larger fi (0.602) than fic(3-4) (0.316). This is consistent with experimental findings where G does not appear in A N B8-N compounds with N=2 . Consequently, bond length and ionicity are crucial for the structural stability of ANB8-N compounds so that the threefold-coordinated structure does not appear in II-VI and I-VII compounds with large iconicity but limitedly appear in the compounds with small re introducing large p(3) and small fi such as C and BN. References [1] G. C. Abell, Phys. Rev. B 31 (1985) 6184. [2] T. Ito, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1998) L1217. [3] M. Z. Bazant and E. Kaxiras, Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 8542. |
Legal notice |
|
Presentation: Oral at 17th International Conference on Crystal Growth and Epitaxy - ICCGE-17, General Session 1, by Tomonori ItoSee On-line Journal of 17th International Conference on Crystal Growth and Epitaxy - ICCGE-17 Submitted: 2013-03-19 01:48 Revised: 2013-03-19 03:01 |