Search for content and authors
 

Structural characterization of surface layers in DistaloyAE and DistaloyHP

Stanisław J. Skrzypek 1Anders Bergmark 2Marcin Goły 1Wiktoria Ratuszek 1Krzysztof Chruściel 1

1. AGH, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, 30 Mickiewicza Av., Kraków 30-059, Poland
2. Höganäs, Höganäs 263-83, Sweden

Abstract

Purpose of this paper is to elaborate X–ray diffraction methodology for to characterize some chosen qualitative parameters of products made of AE and HP Distalloys. The beneficial feature of diffraction methods is non-destructive character and large number structural informations contained in diffraction pattern. Therefore they have potential ability in application to technological operations and fatigue or corrosion life control.

Design/methodology/approach. The qualitative and quantitative phase analysis (Tab.1) classical sin2? and modified g-sin2? methods were used (Tab.2). The profile diffraction line analysis (PDLA) was used to lattice distortion <e> and to average crystalline size evaluation. All methods were elaborated for both i.e. classical Bragg-Brentano (BB) and grazing incidence angle X-ray diffraction (GID) geometry. In the case of last one, the mentioned above properties can be scanned versus depth under surface in non–destructive way

 

Tab.1. Results of QXDPA with texture correction method and GID geometry. Wavelength lCoKa, RA – retained austenite (non-destructive mode).

Sample - side B(r), method

GID – 10 peaks, Thickness of Measured Layer  [mm]

 

3.8

7.2

10.3

14-15

16-19

 

a5

RA vol.[%]

18.2

19.6

17.9

18.4

18.1

 

a8

RA vol.[%]

27.2

30.1

32.8

29.4

30.9

 

h6

RA vol.[%]

19.8

22.1

23.1

26.8

24.3

 

h8

RA vol.[%]

37.1

40.1

39.0

41.3

37.6

 

 

Tab.2. Tab.2. Results of residual macro-stresses in measured points on samples. Wavelength lCoKa, direction of measurement for residual stress: x - longitudinal,  y– transverse, diffraction line {211}Fea, , σx, σysin2y  method, σxg-sin2y  method.

Sample

Layer thickness [μm], g-sin2y

B-B (211), sin2y

3.8

7.2

10.3

14-15

16-19

 

a5

σx [MPa]

 

134

93

84

8

20

36

σ [MPa]

 

-

-

-

-

-

68

a8

σx [MPa]

 

142

37±4

22±4

43±8

20±5

38

σy [MPa]

 

-

-

-

-

-

-5

h6

σx [MPa]

 

21±2

121±21

146±20

71±9

84±11

23

σy [MPa]

 

-

-

-

-

-

17

h8

σx [MPa]

 

64±6

94±11

169±13

66±7

-9±3

84

σy [MPa]

 

-

-

-

-

-

53

 

Findings in this type of sintered samples diffusion growth in solid along grains take place during sintering. The gradients of elements concentration versus grain cross-section and the irregular space distribution of retained austenite make this alloy as composite with gradient-like microstructure. This gradient-like structure is confirmed here by residual macroscopic stresses measurement, quantitative X ray diffraction phase analysis, micro-stresses and texture factor.

Research limitations/implications. The irregular distribution of retained austenite indicates to no uniformity in larger scale then the irradiated volume due to particular X-ray diffraction method (compared results for BB and GID diffraction). The ability of X-ray diffraction methods based on  GID geometry to scan structural properties layer by layer is promising to this type of composite-like materials. Whole these results confirm non-uniformity of structural and phase composition. This approach can be used to characterize structural properties of thin surface layer or film invisible with traditional geometry.

Practical implications Relations between above structural features and some properties at selected points on the samples will hopefully provide more general concluding and beneficial issues in term of quality of sinters.

 

Legal notice
  • Legal notice:
 

Presentation: Poster at 11th European Powder Diffraction Conference, Poster session, by Stanisław J. Skrzypek
See On-line Journal of 11th European Powder Diffraction Conference

Submitted: 2008-04-30 14:48
Revised:   2009-06-07 00:48