Phase Equilibrium in Nanoscale Alloys

Joerg Weissmueller 

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Nanotechnologie, Herrmann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Karlsruhe 76344, Germany

Abstract


Phase Equilibrium in Nanoscale Alloys

Jörg Weissmüller, Peter Bunzel, Gerhard Wilde, Christian Lemier
Institut für Nanotechnologie, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe
and
Technische Physik, Universität des Saarlandes
When the size of a particle is reduced then the excess free energy due
to the surface and to internal interfaces, gA (g - interfacial free
energy; A - area), diminishes more slowly than the free energies of
the bulk phases; the interfacial excess will therefore increasingly
affect the free energy balance of phase transformations. While some
related phenomena have been studied since the 19th century, there is
an ongoing interest in reversible phase transformations in
nanoparticles, specifically, size-dependent melting.
Phenomenologically, the origin of the size-dependence of the
temperature of fusion T[f] in elemental solids is a change Dg in the
interfacial free energy upon melting, in other words a term of the
form A[ ]Dg. It is straightforward to derive the size-dependence of
T[f] for a given value of Dg, but atomistic theories for interfacial
energies are often not accurate enough to allow the prediction of the
numerical value of Dg, or even of its sign. By contrast, meaningful
predictions are obtained by analysis of the equilibrium in nanoscale
alloys in terms of phenomenological approaches. This includes the
effects of grain boundary segregation on the position of phase
coexistence lines in alloy phase diagrams,1 and on the stability of
nanocrystalline alloys against grain growth,2 as well as the effect of
grain boundary induced stress on the miscibility gap in solid
solutions.3 While segregation and stress are of relevance in processes
subject to the constraint of constant interfacial area, the two-phase
equilibrium in matrix-isolated alloy particles involves reversible
changes of the interfacial area as a function of the phase fraction,
in other words terms of the form g DA. As we shall show, even with the
simplest constitutive equations this term leads to substantial shifts
in the phase diagram and even to qualitative changes in the nature of
the associated phase transformations.
-
1: J. Weissmüller, H. Ehrhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998), 1114.
2: J. Weissmüller, NanoStruct. Mater. 3 (1993), 261.
3: J. Weissmüller, C. Lemier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999), 213.

Legal notice
  • Legal notice:

    Copyrighted materials, (c) Pielaszek Research, all rights reserved.
    The above materials, including auxiliary resources, are subject to Publisher's copyright and the Author(s) intellectual rights. Without limiting Author(s) rights under respective Copyright Transfer Agreement, no part of the above documents may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval or caching system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Pielaszek Research, the Publisher. Express permission from the Author(s) is required to use the above materials for academic purposes, such as lectures or scientific presentations.
    In every case, proper references including Author(s) name(s) and URL of this webpage: http://science24.com/paper/356 must be provided.

 

Related papers
  1. Small Angle Neutron Scattering Investigations of Spin Disorder in Nanocomposite Soft Magnets
  2. Surface stress, the lattice parameter of small crystallites and its response to pressure
  3. Internal Friction Study of the Melting of PB Inclusion in AL Matrix
  4. Electronically Tunable Properties of Nanocrystalline Metals

Presentation: oral at E-MRS Fall Meeting 2002, by Joerg Weissmueller
See On-line Journal of E-MRS Fall Meeting 2002

Submitted: 2003-02-16 17:33
Revised:   2009-06-08 12:55
Google
 
Web science24.com
© 1998-2021 pielaszek research, all rights reserved Powered by the Conference Engine